Komparativ ret
The Meaning of a Fair Trial: A Comparative Study of Jurisprudence of the American Federal Courts and the European Court of Human Rights
Kacper Zajac
Aarhus University, Department of Law
kacperzajac@law.au.dk
http://pure.au.dk/portal/en/kacperzajac@law.au.dk
Starting date: 1 September 2019
Completion date: 31 August 2022
Project description:
A comparative study of the rights of the accused in the criminal trial under the 5th and 6th Amendments to the US Constitution and Article 6 and Article 4 of Protocol 7 of the European Convention on Human Rights to determine their exact scope in relation to one another.
Samhandel i koncerner
Julie Bryske Møller Nielsen
Juridisk Institut, Aarhus Universitet
+ 45 40 21 55 82
http://pure.au.dk/portal/da/jbmn@law.au.dk
Startdato: 01.09.2018
Slutdato: 31.09.2023
Projekt beskrivelse:
Artikelbaseret ph.d.-projekt om samhandel i koncerner. Første artikel omhandler transaktioner med nærtstående i børsnoterede selskaber. Følgende emner er desuden relevant for projektet: koncernret (i alle EU-medlemsstater), ledelsesansvar, transaktioners ugyldighed, konkurskarantæne, komparativ analyse, EU-retlig selskabsret, skatteretlig regulering af samhandel i koncerner og transaktioner med nærtstående.
The Transfer of Rights and Obligations under Bills of Lading in a Digitalized Age
Lærke Bjørka Fosgaard
Aalborg University, Faculty of Law
lbf@law.aau.dk
+ 45 29 62 67 34
Starting date: 1 October 2018
Completion date: 30 September 2021
Project description:
Denmark participates, alongside with other member states, in the preparation phase on legislative and non-legislative instruments from UNCITRAL. However, Denmark is reluctant to adopt and implement the very same legislative and non-legislative instruments. Accordingly, the outset of this PhD thesis is to investigate the advantages and disadvantages in regard to implementation of the latest model law adopted by UNCITRAL in 2017 concerning electronic transferable records.
Taking Rights of Nature and Human Rights Seriously
Katarina Hovden
Centre for European and Comparative Legal Studies (CECS), Faculty of Law, University of Copenhagen
+ +45 42 72 62 91
https://jura.ku.dk/english/staff/research/?pure=en/persons/604967
Starting date: 1 September 2017
Completion date: 31 August 2021
Project description:
Rights of nature are gaining traction. Several countries have adopted rights of nature laws (at constitutional, national, and local level) or recognised the rights of nature in court judgments. These laws and legal sources inter alia recognise that nature is a subject of the law, and, in certain cases, grant specific legal rights to nature. Born out of an Earth-centred or ecological paradigm, rights of nature (laws) present a fundamental challenge to the otherwise anthropocentric or human-centric system of law and governance.
Set against these developments, the PhD project studies the relationship(s) between the rights of nature and human rights in jurisdictions that recognise both categories of right-holders. Mindful that most legal and governance systems remain anthropocentric, individualistic and mechanistic in their very structure, the project will investigate what happens at the interface between the old paradigm (most existing individual human rights) and the new, ecological paradigm (the rights of nature). Questions to be explored include> When rights conflict (as they often do), whose rights prevail and under what circumstances? Is there a risk that the prevailing (anthropocentric) legal order will subsume and swallow the ecological one, rendering the rights of nature “mere rhetoric”? If so, what would it take for the ecological paradigm to penetrate the anthropocentric machinery of law?
Forvaltningskontrakter: Aftaler og myndighedsudøvelse
Rasmus Grønved Nielsen
Københavns Universitet, Det Juridiske Fakultet
rasmus.gronved.nielsen@jur.ku.dk
+45 21 74 92 03
http://jura.ku.dk/phd/blaa_bog/?pure=da/persons/413573
Startdato: 1. november 2017
Slutdato: 1. marts 2021
Projektbeskrivelse:
Afhandlingen beskæftiger sig med aftaler mellem forvaltningsmyndigheder og borgere med særlig fokus på aftaler om myndighedsudøvelse ("forvaltningskontrakter"). Afhandlingen har navnlig til formål at identificere forskellige aftaletyper og vurdere, hvorvidt der kan opstilles almindelige principper i tilknytning hertil gennem en integration af forvaltningsretlige og kontraktretlige normer. Afhandlingen inddrager perspektiver fra navnlig tysk, norsk og fransk ret.
Excessive Pharmaceutical prices as an anti-competitive practice in TRIPS & European Competition Law
Behrang Kianzad
University of Copenhagen, Faculty of Law, CeBIL, Center for Advanced Studies in Biomedical Innovation Law
+45 35 33 39 07
http://jura.ku.dk/english/staff/research/?pure=en/persons/604260
Starting date: 1 September 2017
Completion date: 31 August 2020
Project description:
An investigation of the triangular dilemma of strong Intellectual Property protection, contra high prices of medicines as result of the global Intellectual Property regime and finally the legal-economic rationales and discourses underlying Intellectual Property Law / competition law / intervention. The aim is to establish what constitutes anti-competitive practices such as excessive prices in TRIPS & EU Competition Law, by making the case for the excessiveness of prices as an anti-competitive practice in and out of themselves from a legal-economic / competition law perspective.
Kontraktrummets betingelser for efficient anvendelse af Offentlig Privat Partnerskab - et socialt infrastrukturelt perspektiv
Sandie Nøhr Nielsen
Copenhagen Business School - Juridisk Institut
3815 2605
Startdato: 02.02.2016
Slutdato: 28.12.2019
Projektbeskrivelse:
Sandie Nøhr Nielsen arbejder på en ph.d.-afhandling der analyserer rammerne for mulige gevinster ved Offentlig-Privat Partnerskab (OPP), herunder i hvilken grad kontraktrummet i et OPP kan optimere samarbejdsværdien for den offentlige og private aftalepart. Afhandlingen har fokus på krydsfeltet mellem privatret og offentlig ret, og virkningerne heraf. Forskningen har et særligt fokus på sociale infrastrukturelle OPP’er og den kontraktuelle relation. Erfaringer fra Konkurrence- og Forbrugerstyrelsen viser, at der for den offentlige part er flere forhold der gør sig gældende for, hvornår OPP er økonomisk fordelagtigt. Formålet med afhandlingen er, at forsøge at give et fællesoptimerende perspektiv på anvendelsen af OPP, for herigennem at øge samarbejdet mellem sektorerne, sikre en optimeret samarbejdsværdi og en optimering af OPP kontrakten.